New Hires’ under-performance caused by Seven Factors
Posted: under Human Resources, Management, Recruitment.
Tags: Accountable, Goals, hiring process, hiring staff, Human Resources, inadequate capability, poor job fit, poor relationships, reasons for under performance, recruiting, recruiting process, Recruitment issues, relationships
Recruiters who stay informed about their new placement’s progress can help employers address teething problems by understanding the seven causes of under-performance, says MyProfiles Worldwide managing director, Axel Henriksen.
Sometimes, he says in the report, Why Smart Employees Underperform, the candidate seems to have “the right experience, solid qualifications, and a relevant work history, and… gave an impressive performance during the interview process”, but three months later their team is disgruntled, morale is low, and output and productivity are down.
He says the causes of under-performance are “hazards” that can be addressed.
Poor job fit
While skills can be taught, “behaviours are much more difficult to change”, the report says.
Too many people choose their jobs because of external influences, it says, without understanding themselves and their “mental DNA”. But it’s difficult to change natural behaviour, so if an employee isn’t motivated to change, then he or she “probably won’t”.
Henriksen advises recruiters to: “Know the job, know what type of person is successful in that job, and then hire others who have the behavioural traits that fit that job.” This is “easier said than done”, he notes, “but behavioural assessments can be extremely helpful”.
Inadequate capability
It’s no secret that most candidates exaggerate their abilities on their resumes and job applications, Henriksen points out, but when their capability - their skills, tools and experience - is lacking there is an increased chance that they will underperform.
Employers can avoid this hazard by being clear during the recruitment process on what skills the employee needs to perform in their job. If they are missing, the employer needs to know how to help the employee acquire them and how long the process will take.
Employers also need to ensure they’re providing the tools that help an employee deliver peak performance, he says, but importantly they need to recognise that “just because an employee has the skills to do a job doesn’t mean that he has the experience to apply those skills in his specific position.”
Recent graduates, outside hires from different industries and internal hires from different departments need special attention early in their employment because they might be used to different applications and terminology, and need time to learn and adjust, he adds.
Fuzzy goals and accountabilities
“Employees need to be very clear about their responsibilities and about the results you expect them to achieve,” Henriksen says.
He says SMART goals help employees focus on what is most important to the business, and should be:
• Specific - the employee should be able to answer, at a minimum: Who is involved? What needs to be accomplished? When is the deadline? Why is this goal important?
• Measurable - when progress is measured, employees stay on track, reach their targets and experience the sense of achievement that motivates them to keep working toward their goal.
• Aligned - individual goals need to support the organisation’s priorities, otherwise the employee is not channeling his or her efforts in the most productive manner.
• Realistic - employees must be both willing and able to work toward the goal, and will more likely perceive it as realistic if they have accomplished something similar in the past, Henriksen says.
• Timed - if there is no timeframe, “there is no sense of urgency”.
Poor relationship with manager
A poor employee/manager relationship is the number-one reason for failure at work, Henriksen says, and it’s usually caused by one of two “flashpoints”.
Either the employee is unclear about the manager’s expectations, or the manager fails to adapt his or her style to the employee’s preferred styles.
The former problem can be addressed by ensuring the employee asks questions like “What are the top three priorities in my role that you would like me to focus on?” and “Why is this so important?” while the latter requires managers to understand their own styles as well as those of employees.
Poor relationship with co-workers
Four primary factors harm employee relationships:
• Insensitivity toward others - this can damage any sort of team dynamic and potentially expose the employer to a hostile work environment and employment discrimination law suits, Henriksen says. “Managers who sense this hostility need to take quick and decisive action to prevent it from continuing.”
• Unclear accountability - conflict can emerge between employees when they are unclear about business objectives, priorities, deadlines, processes or resources, Henriksen says. This can be a result of mixed messages, so communication is key.
• Poor cultural fit - it’s not enough for an employee to present well on paper; their style, approach, and behaviour on the job must be consistent with the values and expectations of the organisation.
• Incompatible styles - when co-workers’ communication styles and natural behaviours don’t mesh well with one another, and neither is willing to adapt, it causes stress and distraction for the entire team.
Health and wellness issues
“Whether they are absent from work altogether, or present but working at a reduced capacity, employees suffering from physical or mental illness have difficulty performing at their peak,” Henriksen says.
He says a comprehensive worksite health promotion program typically involves education about healthy living; supportive social and physical environments; programs to help employees achieve work/life balance; worksite screening; and follow-up interventions.
Physical and environmental factors
Numerous studies show that a pleasant and comfortable work environment improves worker productivity and reduces turnover, Henriksen says.
Factors to consider include indoor temperature (ideally about 22 degrees), air quality, lighting conditions, excessive noise and traffic, a physical workplace layout that encourages efficient communication flow (but minimal disruption), and ergonomically correct workstations.
Comments (0)
Aug 19 2009








